In my last few blogposts I talked about
how life working is built upon a blend of both
home-based and workplace-based productivity - what I call ‘at home days’ and
‘away days’.
Now I would like to make what I am sure is a pretty
controversial claim – we should completely rethink the way that vacation time is seen as blocks of leisure
time interspersed throughout an overall productive working year.
I believe that it is completely within
reason that future work models could reject this approach, and that knowledge
workers might be productive in a ‘seasonal’ manner - just like their agrarian
ancestors. Indeed, this is the way in which many free agents, including myself,
work today.
About two thirds of my annual income is generated
in the Spring and Autumn months which coincide with the conference and event
season in Europe. My kids completely understand this now – In May and June and
September through November their Pappa has many more away-days in his calendar.
But they equally know that the remainder of the year is dominated by at-home
days, and that July and August are 100% family time – usually involving camping
in a tent somewhere in southern Europe.
I recall a conversation with my 12 year old son Ries last year when I
apologised for a pretty intense period of away-days in September. He said
“That’s okay Pappa, that is why we get to see so much of you at the other
times.”
For about four or five months of the year
I put a lot of energy into my work, and I still try to be a good husband and
father - although I am away from home a bit more than normal. But I am
certainly not at my best as a sportsman as I simply do not have the time to
train at a high level. In the other months of the year, the energy I put into
my family, my sport and my other passions far exceeds that which goes into
‘workplace’ activities.
I am sure that the mere suggestion of such
an approach – workers being intensively productive for just three to six months
of the year - would cause on uproar in most organizational settings. Can you imagine a salesperson at a bank or
technology company reaching their annual targets within the first quarter of
the year, and then the business agreeing that they could enjoy the remaining nine
months in an at-home mode to focus more on family and personal passions - like
studying a philosophy course, learning to scuba dive or training for a
marathon?
No way! The response of the organization
would be that if a sales person can hit an annual target in three months, then
of course the annual target should be quadrupled! Many top-performing sales
people know this of course, and make sure that even if they can hit their
targets in three to six months they stagger their contracts throughout the year.
Or they conclude their biggest contracts at the end of the sales period. That’s
right sales people – we know your game!
My 40-year-old friend David lives in
Belgium and is an excellent B2B salesman and a competitive cyclist. His job in selling
machinery involves him meeting with clients, developing proposals and concluding large contracts. But
he also has an understanding with his employer that his cycling passion is very
important to him. David trains around 10 to 15 hours per week pretty much all
year round, with about half of that during weekdays. In certain months of the
year, such as April-May and August-September he competes a lot and ramps up his
training. Naturally, these months are less productive in a commercial sense, but
that is not a problem for his boss who is focused on David’s yearly output, not
on obsessing that every quarter will deliver the same results. The company is
proud of David’s sporting achievements, and his commercial results are also widely
respected.
David and I have a lot in common – and in
fact he is one of my toughest competitors. The only difference is that he is
employed by an organization while I am a free agent. But I would not call what
David and I do work-life balance, would you? The idea of ‘balance’ presumes a
constant tension – a tilting between work and non-work priorities. For the two
of us, we actually experience very little tension.
Lifeworking
is more like a rotating work-life seesaw, periodically rotating and tilting between
different priorities. The most important thing of course is that you are the
one steering the seesaw, and this is the theme I will address in my next post.
The Latins termed this theory with these few words: "mens sana in corpore sano".
ReplyDeleteThis is also my philosophy ... sport and sport ... this is what we have to teach our children.
One of the best work of this period I did, after a nice bike ride, sitting with my pc in the middle of a field in a beautifull sunny day!
Franco
I forgot to say ... luckily there are still people like Jamie who profess this philosophy which, in hindsight, is a symptom of a very professional performance based on quality rather than quantity of work.
ReplyDeleteFranco